Courtesy of Artsy

Feature
Art market

Artsy and the rise of the matchmaker market

In the bricks-versus-clicks shakeout, the new power players in online auctions are harvesting data from both the supply and demand sides

Artsy Auctions team at Artsy HQ in Tribeca Courtesy of Artsy

Devang Thakkar was half awake at 4am, Seattle time, and had to blink twice at the live auction at Phillips in Hong Kong on his screen. A client in New Jersey was bidding over Artsy’s app, going after a George Condo painting. The bidder was knocked out once, then twice, but ultimately prevailed, winning the Condo for an above-­estimate HK$2.48m. In that moment Thakkar, a trained software engineer and head of auctions for Artsy, knew his vision was working.

With the New York-based start-up’s announcement over the summer of an additional $50m in venture funding, online auction wars are heating up. According to the 2017 Hiscox Online Art Trade Report, the past year has seen increasing competition in the digital sales sphere, causing casualties for online start-ups that had vowed to “disrupt” the estimated $3.75bn segment of the industry. The heritage incumbents are stepping up their game; in a bold move, Sotheby’s announced in late August that it was doing away with buyer’s premium for online-only sales.

No single seller has achieved critical mass, and the model that has gained the most traction is the third-party marketplace, which functions not as a threat to existing, trusted brands but as a facilitator for them. Rather than competing with bricks-and-mortar houses for quality consignments, they help market it to a wider clientele and provide sophisticated live-bidding technology.

“A philosophical switch”

Megan Newcome, the director of digital strategy at Phillips, which has experimented with various online partnerships, believes a “philosophical switch” is afoot. “I think in the past, the concept was ‘Let’s partner with these sites in the hope that everyone that bids will then come to Phillips and forget about the old channel.’” Now, she says, the sense is, the more doorways the better: “We’re not necessarily trying to drive them to Phillips. We just want to expose that audience to the Phillips brand.”

Boston-based Invaluable is one such example. With 5,400 sellers, three million monthly unique visitors and $10bn in listed items, it is a giant in the third-party platform arena. (The next largest, LiveAuctioneers, lists around 3,500 sellers.) Its chief executive since 2012, Rob Weisberg, a former Zipcar executive, believes the iPad is overtaking the paddle—more than 40% of the site’s traffic is from a mobile device.

Launched in 2009, Invaluable.com is the product of a merger of auction-support businesses, including the vast auction price database Artfact. By providing an integrated plug-in on the back end for the houses’ own websites and serving thousands of sales to potential buyers through a single portal, Invaluable allows small, local houses visibility alongside multinational firms.

This model, whereby houses essentially “keep” the existing clients of their own websites but gain access to a wider audience through Invaluable.com, “created a separation of church and state that was palatable to the auction houses”, Weisberg says. If you are Sotheby’s, he says, “you have no visibility into a Christie’s customer’s behaviour unless that customer is buying from both. Invaluable has the unique position of seeing buyer behaviour across 5,000 auction houses…We give them targeting capabilities through media channels that they could not do themselves.”

For buyers, it is one-stop browsing and bidding. “We act as the personal shopper,” Weisberg says. “Essentially, we’re going through 10,000 catalogues a month on your behalf to find and filter just the stuff you’re interested in seeing.” Fine art is the most popular category on the site, which also offers antiques, jewellery, furniture, and other collectables. (Christie’s is notably absent, favouring proprietary channels. Sales through its site totalled $217m last year. Bonhams has also so far eschewed third-party platforms.)

Invaluable’s technology, ­modelled on the Nasdaq stock exchange, is used by eBay Live Auctions and Sotheby’s, which since 2015 has relied on Invaluable to power its online bidding. “We’re running 17,000 auctions a year—24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year, in 52 countries,” Weisberg says. “Milliseconds matter. You have to be able to take high-frequency trading bids from all over the world.” In 2016 it upgraded its video feed, a feature that Weisberg believes is key to kindling competition: “It can be like a prize fight at very high levels. Live video capability is paramount to maintaining that feeling of excitement.”

When he read in TechCrunch this past summer that the Artsy co-founder Carter Cleveland had dismissed current video technology as not yet ripe for his site, given the global spread of Artsy users, Weisberg says, “I wanted to send a note over saying ‘We’ve been doing this for over five years.’”

George Condo’s Naked Lunch (2008) was sold for HK$2.48m in a live auction via Artsy’s app at Phillips Hong Kong Courtesy of Phillips

Creating a virtuous cycle

While Invaluable has built a reputation on translating auctions into the digital sphere, the continually evolving Artsy is a more amorphous entity that tends to inspire either enthusiasm or confusion. Its co-founder and president Sebastian Cwilich, a former Christie’s executive, speaks of eventually becoming a centralised hub for all art information and transactions, and the company has so far totted up more than $100m in investment, including from the dealer Larry Gagosian and Dasha Zhukova, the founder of Garage Museum of Contemporary Art in Moscow.

According to Robert Read, the author of the Hiscox report, art start-ups face a “chicken-or-egg” challenge: they must generate trust to win quality partners or consignments, which generate more trust, creating a virtuous cycle. Mindful of this loop, Artsy has systematically cultivated art-world players ranging from museums to fairs to galleries big and small, all while cementing its credentials among a youthful and tech-obsessed audience via splashy Art Basel Miami Beach parties and other events. Artsy claims 24 million unique visitors since the site was launched in 2012, many drawn by its deep well of editorial content. The site’s bread and butter is exhibition and artwork listings for 2,000 galleries around the world, helping drive more than $20m in monthly sales.

When he arrived in 2015, Thakkar’s brief was to create a live auction integration that, in its elegance and accuracy, would help breed that elusive trust. He settled on a hybrid system wherein an Artsy clerk in the room translates the bid activity to the Artsy app, while users’ bids—including those placed before the sale’s start—are automatically sorted for the clerk to register in the room on their behalf. “It’s pretty complex math that happens in the back end,” says Thakkar who, while at Microsoft, invented the control-Z “undo” keyboard shortcut. “But we’ve simplified that into a human-readable, six-button thing. You can’t get it wrong.” Since the first live sale with the Swiss auctioneer Koller in June 2016, he can recall a single hitch: when Amazon’s cloud, which hosts the lot images, went down, and a Phillips sale had to be delayed for 30 minutes.

From two auctions in 2015 to 41 in 2016, Artsy is on track for more than 170 in 2017, bridging its audience to select sales at Christie’s, Sotheby’s and Phillips, plus a range of smaller houses, including Rago in Lambertville, New Jersey, Waddington’s in Toronto, and Veritas in Portugal. Bidding activity has grown 900% year on year, with Artsy clients in 84 countries bidding on a third of all lots listed on the site and winning about 8% of them.

In July, Artsy and Phillips presented Summer School, a co-curated online auction that culminated in a party Courtesy of Phillips / Phillips.com

Cracking Open a Pipeline

Heritage Auctions, with a market-leading $348.5m in online sales in 2016, might not seem to need Artsy’s help, but last year the Dallas-based house began listing select sales with Artsy to reach a different audience. Leon Benrimon, the house’s director of Modern and contemporary art in New York, is able to sell edgier material on Artsy than he can on Heritage’s own, and has also accepted consignments from Artsy users. Last season, he recalls, Heritage offered an Alex Israel via Artsy. “We had bids up to the high estimate of $200,000 on Artsy in advance of the sale. Not the day of—in advance of it. That’s something that people would have told you would never happen, but it’s happening.”

But if a buyer bids through Artsy, they are effectively Artsy’s client—which is where the site’s gallery network becomes a distinct advantage. For those who lose out on a lot, “we do help that user discover other things in the future”, Thakkar says. Depending on their preferences, a user might receive an email showing them what other works by the artist are available in other auctions or galleries on the site. If the work is an edition, Artsy might be able to source another by notifying its seller network. “We’re starting to experiment: if there is an exact match available today, how do we best connect them?” Thakkar says. But—as with its nascent consignment channel—any matchmaking by Artsy would be double blind: “Both parties have to agree, and then we connect the dots. We are looking at what we can do for this under-bidder scenario, where we can, under a privacy umbrella, start introducing people.”

The company is seeking creative ways to leverage the supply and demand data it is harvesting. Anders Petterson, the founder of the market research firm ArtTactic, says, “I think to engage new people, new tools are required. New collectors want transparency, particularly in the online market. And you have the financial services industry looking at art as an alternative asset class, a financial instrument, and they require data.” The problem for the art market so far has been that it is too small and too slippery to quantify with the existing data points—and those who have more intel have been happy to keep it to themselves.

In April, Artsy acquired ArtAdvisor, a data science firm co-founded by Lucas Zwirner and Massachusetts Institute of Technology-trained “taste” specialist Hugo Liu, who was appointed Artsy’s first chief scientist. Liu’s field is trend prediction and artificial intelligence; his hire suggests that the company will lean more heavily on personalised data to create actionable insights—however each user, from the day-trader to the nervous novice, might define that. “Data helps us create a better customer experience”, says Cwillich, “and you can imagine a product where we’re able to advise our partners on the appetites of our collectors and broader market trends.”

Read is loath to place bets on any future winner, but says: “People look online for information about art and also opinions about art. If you become the go-to place for information, I think that gives you an incredibly powerful position.”

Appeared in The Art Newspaper, 294 October 2017