Conservation Heritage News Italy

Leading museum directors and celebrities call on Italian government to ban giant ships from Venice

Petition signed by actors Rob Lowe, Cate Blanchett and Michael Caine as well as Richard Armstrong and Nicholas Penny

The campaign "No big ships" intensifies, photo by Nick Miller

More than 50 leading figures from the worlds of art, film, fashion and architecture have signed a petition calling for a ban on giant cruise ships sailing through Venice. Cate Blanchett, Julie Christie, Michael Caine and Rob Lowe are among the signatories urging the Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi and the Italian Minister of Culture and Tourism, Dario Franceschini, to “halt the passage of the big ships across the Bacino San Marino and along the Giudecca canal”.

Nicholas Penny, the director of the National Gallery in London, Richard Armstrong, the director of the Guggenheim Foundation, the architect Norman Foster and his wife Elena also endorse the appeal which has been launched by the Association of the International Private Committees for the Safeguarding of Venice, a network of conservation organisations backed by Unesco.

Last year, the Italian government decided to reduce the number of cruise ships sailing through Venice by close to 30% from November 2014, but at the cost of further damaging the lagoon through deep dredging a channel which will allow the ships to arrive in the port of Venice round the back of the city.

At a meeting called on 6 November, the then prime minister Enrico Letta announced that there would be a gradual reduction in the number of ships entering the city and that the plan favoured by Paolo Costa, president of the Venice Port Authority, of a new route through the lagoon, via the Canale Contorta Sant'Angelo, would be carried out.

But in March a regional tribunal overturned the Italian government’s partial ban on large cruise ships, pending a court hearing in October. Ships subsequently continue to arrive—more than 1,100 sailings a year back and forth through the city— because of the major contribution they make to the economy of the port. The largest of the ships is 110,000 gross tonnes and the length of three football pitches (the Titanic was 46,000 gross tonnes).

Anna Somers Cocks, the chief executive of The Art Newspaper, has signed the petition. She says: “The situation is that the ships are still coming in as before because there is no acceptable alternative route, the proposed Canale Contorta Sant'Angelo being too damaging to the lagoon because it would have to be dredged to a depth of about 20 metres, which would accelerate sediment loss. A proposed floating port outside the Lido entrance, with passengers coming in on smaller boats, would be the best solution, but where is the money to come from?”

More from The Art Newspaper

Comments

1 Aug 14
19:0 CET

KATHERINE MCNEIL, LONDON

Small is beautiful. A return to passenger vessels will connect with the intricate scale of this unique and special place

4 Aug 14
17:29 CET

MOUNA RAMCKE, PINNEBERG- GERMANY

How dreadful to abuse such a beautifuf city in the name of economic explotation. Money, money, money is that all that this world can offer?

30 Jul 14
22:11 CET

MARGARET MITCHELL, NEW YORK

I have not yet seen Venice but I do dream of doing so. It seems to me that the highest priority for that fragile, beautiful and historic city is that it be preserved from the natural threats it already endures. Adding careless and short sighted man made threats based on short term profit only will create further damage to escalate the demise of that city is beyond imagining. The concept of a floating port is the only thing that makes any sense and as for the money….multiple sources should fundraise but the cruise ships should be the primary source of that funding…..they can well afford it if they want to keep bring hordes of passengers to Venice for the next 100 years. One dollar for every passenger multiplied by millions of them should be an easy get?

30 Jul 14
22:13 CET

VISHAAN, WASHINGTONDC

Since financial drivers of the local venetian economy are simultaneously hastening environmental damage, what of a considerable shipping tax are liners over a certain weight. Make Venice considerably more expensive to visit...because ppl will still come....because it's Venice of course :)

30 Jul 14
22:14 CET

SEMRA, AUSTRALIA

Agree..no oversized boats in Venice

30 Jul 14
22:14 CET

ALEXANDRINE DE MUN, VENICE

Venice needs the international community to be saved from unproper use by the authorities that do not respect the high value and fragility of this city. Another proof of it, is the huge Mose fraud. This cultural heritage MUST be handle to our children and deserved a specil administration and special rules.

30 Jul 14
22:16 CET

DON BUCK, ORFORD

I recommend contributing $$$ to a local Venetian organization called "No Grandi Navi" in addition to creating national presure as described in this article.

Submit a comment

All comments are moderated. If you would like your comment to be approved, please use your real name, not a pseudonym. We ask for your email address in case we wish to contact you - it will not be made public and we do not use it for any other purpose.

Email*
 
Name*
 
City*
 
Comment*
 

Want to write a longer comment to this article? Email letters@theartnewspaper.com

 

Share this