News Germany

German government bows to pressure, creates task force to investigate Munich art cache

Officials publish 25 works with questionable provenance from Gurlitt collection online

Max Liebermann, Reiter am Strand (riders on the beach), 1901

Amid international pressure, the German government has published 25 works online from the extraordinary discovery of 1,406 pieces of art found in a Munich apartment and will create a task force to speed up investigations into the provenance of the works.

“We want to move [the research] forward and we will announce further details on our procedure later this week,” a government spokesman, Steffen Seibert, said in Berlin on Monday. The government further revealed that 970 works are currently under investigation. The ownership history of 590 of them is unclear while 380 pieces were once classified as “degenerate art”. The remaining works were not acquired unlawfully, according to a government press statement.

The first 25 works with questionable provenance, from the so-called “Schwabing art trove”, were posted to the Lost Art database on 11 November, and the rest will be added online shortly. The New York Daily News reports that the lawyer acting on behalf of Anne Sinclair, the former wife of the French economist Dominique Strauss-Kahn, was “in the process of submitting a claim” for the Matisse painting Sitting Woman that was published on the site.

The government-initiated task force, meanwhile, will be made up of six experts in provenance research and will be run by the Berliner Arbeitsstelle für Provenienzrecherche (Berlin centre for provenance research) with Ingeborg Berggreen-Merkel at the helm.

According to media reports, Cornelius Gurlitt, the owner of the Munich flat in which the discovery was made and whose whereabouts have hitherto been unknown, was spotted boarding a plane at Munich airport. He is the son of Hildebrand Gurlitt, a Hamburg dealer who was commissioned by the Nazis to sell “degenerate art” abroad.

More from The Art Newspaper

Comments

14 Nov 13
18:2 CET

COLIN LEONARD, LIVERPOOL

Degenerate art is not stolen art. Unless the painting are marked on the back with name of family and a date the painting was not stolen. Sadly many works of art were sold as a means of generating money in order to flee Germany. An art dealer would be the most obvious person to contact. The fact his father was an art dealer and not a commandant of a ghetto also call into question the term stolen. As for the Nazi's using him to sell the art who else would they use. Even Germans were do it or die. Not everything found of WW2 origin that is worth a fortune is stolen. Colin Author of the Kestrel Strategy and Metasis Strategy.

Submit a comment

All comments are moderated. If you would like your comment to be approved, please use your real name, not a pseudonym. We ask for your email address in case we wish to contact you - it will not be made public and we do not use it for any other purpose.

Email*
 
Name*
 
City*
 
Comment*
 

Want to write a longer comment to this article? Email letters@theartnewspaper.com

 

Share this

  • Most read (week)
  • Most read (month)
  • Most comments